Modern art in the common cultureLanguage : EnglishNew Haven ; London : Yale University, 1996274 orrialde : koloretako eta zuri-beltzeko irudiak ; 22 cm(Ikus) Testua: bitartekorik gabeISBN : 0-300-06438-1.Culture | Modern art -- 20th-21st centuries | Fragment
|Current location||Collection||Call number||Status||Date due||Barcode|
|Tabakalera-Ubik Orokorra / General||Arteleku||111 CRO mod (Browse shelf)||Available||652604|
Must avant-garde art hold itself apart from the values and beliefs widely held in the common culture? Must advanced artists always be the symbolic adversaries of the ordinary citizen?
These questions have dominated, even paralyzed the modern art world, particularly in recent years when perceived elitism and imposed canons of taste have come under fire from all sides. In this stimulating book, a prominent art historian shows that the links between advanced art and modern mass culture have always been robust, indeed necessary to both. Thomas Crow focuses on the continual interdependence between the two phenomena, providing examples that range from Paris in the mid-nineteenth century to the latest revivals of Conceptual art in the 1990s.
Crow's argument proceeds through a series of vividly described episodes: Jackson Pollock being enlisted into the realm of fashion by his first patron; Andy Warhol keeping one foot in a small-town sentiment through his definitive work of the 1960s; an audacious woman artist, Sturtevant, confronting incomprehension and hostility when she turned Pop art tactics against the Pop painters themselves (and being vindicated twenty years later by an entirely new generation of artists); Gerhard Richter's sophisticated painting converging with amateur production in its uses of photography; Gordon Matta-Clark raiding derelict buildings to find the raw material of his sculpture; Ross Bleckner redefining his painting of the 1980s through the decayed, funerary kitsch of Victorian America; Christopher Williams remaking a high Conceptual art with mental maps provided by the tourist industry.
From inquiry into these and many other cases comes a new and fresh kind of cultural theory, one no longer imposed on artists from the outside but instead made from within the living practice of art.